My theory on the nature of the Universe

The Gavaskar Field Theory

Yes. I’ve written a novel called “The Gavaskar Field” but it is more than just a fiction. It is also my theory on the nature of everything. The writing of the novel is in part a way for me to expose this theory to the light of day.

The Gavaskar Field is my attempt to answer some puzzling questions not yet answered by the scientific establishment. I have no way to proove this theory nor any idea how it may be tested.

The two questions I am most interested in are: One, how do we explain the accelaration of the Universe’s expansion: Two, sub atomic particles come and go in the quantum world, when they go where do they go to?

I propose that there is an underlying structure to the Universe that is the frame work that all matter hangs on. This structure is one unified field I call the Gavaskar Field after a fictional character I attribute this theory to. It is different from the Higgs field in that the Gavaskar field is universal, that it is one sructure from one end of the Universe to the other. It forms the boundary of our Universe. The Higgs field theory is more about explaining the workings of sub atomic particles and in my theory may be describing some of the workings of the Gavaskar Field.

I further propose that the Gavaskar Field is spinning. For some time astrophysisists have been trying to understand what could be making the Universe accelerate in its expansion. Logic would tell us that after the Big Bang matter would fly apart indefinitely till the Universe bacame a frozen and empty waste, “The Big Chill”, or gravity would slow the expansion untill things started falling back towards the center again, “The Big Crunch”. 

We lived with that for a long time, till we discovered that the Universe is actually speeding up. The current scientific answer is dark matter and energy, things we can not see, touch, taste, smell or observe in any way. It has to be there, we say, because of what we observe the Universe doing.

How about looking at it in a different way? If the Universe is sitting on a framework that is spinning wouldn’t centrifugal fource cause expansion to accelerate?

I origionally started with the idea of a spinning universe to account for the accelerating expansion. I tossed this idea to friends and one especially bright compadre asked, “Spinning in relation to what?” 

My theory presupposes there is something outside the universe that it is a contained unit. Contained by what? That is when I came up with the idea that the Universe is made up of a field, a structure. What we see (planets, stars, galaxies, us) is just foam floating on this underlying structure.

This theory is consistent with the multi-universe model propossed by Stephen Hawking. That theory supposes that there are multiple Universes that sprout like bubbles out of the Cosmose. The Gavaksar Field is the structure of the bubble Universe we live in. Our bubble is spinning with relation to the space the we and the other bubble Universes are sitting in.

Almost eveything we see in the Universe is spinning. Planets spin, stars spin, galaxies spin. A spinning Universe would explain that.

The end will not be the Big Bang, the Big Chill or even the Big Rip. The end of the Universe will be the Big Pop, when our bubble universe pops like a soap bubble.

The End.